Legal Opinion

Haven & White v. Wakefield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1866PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county. This was a suit in chancery instituted in the court below, by John Wakefield and several others, partners, and with Otis Haven, composing a firm under the name and style of the “Summerfield Building company,” against the same Otis Haven and Charles W. White, partners, composing^ another firm, engaged in the business of raising broom-corn, and the manufacture of brooms therefrom.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county. This was a suit in chancery instituted in the court below, by John Wakefield and several others, partners, and with Otis Haven, composing a firm under the name and style of the “Summerfield Building company,” against the same Otis Haven and Charles W. White, partners, composing^ another firm, engaged in the business of raising broom-corn, and the manufacture of brooms therefrom. The object of the bill was to recover from the defendants the rents which were alleged to have accrued under a lease of certain premises to them by the complainants.…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker

It is insisted that the contract in this case does not amount to a lease of the premises, because the ground on which the building was erected did not belong to appellees when the agreement was executed, nor was the building then in existence. A fair and reasonable construction of the contract, we think, bound appellants for the yearly payment of the stipulated sum as rents; but it gave them the election by which it could be changed from a lease to a purchase of the property, within the period limited for the purpose. And it provided that the money previously paid as rent, if they elected to…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rubens v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Industrial Works v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wheeler v. KuhnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. Ramsey v. TullyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883
  5. Thompson v. Young, Colbourn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API