Polansky v. Millers' Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant assigns as Errors Nos. 4 and 5 the trial court’s denying its motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of 'the plaintiff’s evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. Gr.S. 1-183.
In passing upon such a motion it is well settled law that the plaintiff’s evidence is taken as true, and given every reasonable inference in favor of the plaintiff; the defendant’s evidence, unless favorable to the plaintiff, is not considered, except when not in conflict with plaintiff’s evidence, it may be used to explain or make clear that which has been offered by the plaintiff.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- German American Insurance v. HymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Williams v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hopkins v. ComerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bell v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Taylor v. BrakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.