Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brake

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1957No. 91PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

For present purposes, the plaintiff’s evidence is to be taken as true, and he is entitled to every reasonable intendment and legitimate inference fairly deducible therefrom. Scarborough v. Veneer Co., 244 N.C. 1, 92 S.E. 2d 435; Polonsky v. Ins. Asso., 238 N.C. 427, 78 S.E. 2d 213. Defendants’ evidence in direct conflict with that of plaintiff is not to be considered by the court on a motion for a compulsory nonsuit. Lawrence v. Bethea, 243 N.C. 632, 91 S.E. 2d 594; Brafford v. Cook, 232 N.C. 699, 62 S.E. 2d 327.

At the intersection of Coleman Avenue and Holly Street there were no stop signs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Brafford v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. McEwen Funeral Service, Inc. v. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Wilson v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Lake v. HARRIS EXPRESS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API