Legal Opinion
People v. Perrine
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1975No. Crim. 26146PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
In these six appeals which have been consolidated for hearing and decision, the principal question is the constitutionality of the Los Angeles County ordinance which requires the proprietor of a picture arcade to have a licensed manager on the premises at all times during which the arcade is open and the proprietor is absent.
In municipal court cases M 147997, M 148139, M 149540, M 149542 and M 152532 James J. Perrine was charged with the offense of operating a picture arcade without a licensed manager being present, a misdemeanor violation of Los Angeles County Ordinance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Ellwest Stereo Theatres, Inc. v. WennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ewap, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. Adult World BookstoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Osmond v. Ewap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.