Legal Opinion

Mead Associates, Inc. v. Scottsbluff Sash & Door Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1993No. 91CA1729PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Defendant, Scottsbluff Sash & Door Co., appeals a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Mead Associates, Inc., on a claim for damages resulting from defendant’s refusal to honor a bid for materials for use in a construction project. We affirm.

Defendant submitted a bid to plaintiff for construction materials, which plaintiff subsequently used in preparing its own general contractor’s bid. Defendant mistakenly computed its bid based on supplying “headwall trim” instead of “headwalls” as called for in the general contract plans and specifications. Plaintiff confirmed each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Vigoda v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. MOONY v. CraddockColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Haselden-Langley Constructors, Inc. v. D.E. Farr & Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Mead Associates, Inc. v. AntonsenColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PKG Contracting, Inc. v. MNX, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API