Legal Opinion

Joseph Walker & Sons v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Defendant, a Pennsylvania corporation, appears specially herein and moves to vacate and set aside the service of the summons upon the ground that there is no jurisdiction over said defendant. The question for determination is whether the said defendant is engaged in business within this State, which, in turn, depends upon the activities of the defendant and whether such activities can be construed as actually doing business.

Plaintiff contends that it must be held that defendant is doing business here sufficient for the purposes of jurisdiction because (1) defendant has a transfer agent at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Robert Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Sunrise Lumber Co. v. Homer D. Biery Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Lurie v. RupeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Gilson v. Pittsburgh Forgings CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. Duravest, Inc. v. VISCARDI, AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API