Legal Opinion
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1967No. 64 Civ. 1580PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant Catalysts and Chemicals, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Catalysts”) moves for an order pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing plaintiff’s action against it on the grounds that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and over the person of defendant Catalysts and that venue is improper. In its complaint, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that it is not liable to the Borden Company (hereinafter referred to as “Borden”) with respect to certain accidents which Borden claims were covered by two…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- State v. Colorado State Christian College of the Church of the Inner Power, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Transpacific Corp. (In Re Commodore International, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Northland Paper Company v. Mohawk Tablet CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.