Legal Opinion
Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 10, 2009No. 27370-9-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.
¶1 In Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. State, 144 Wn. App. 593, 606, 183 P.3d 1097 (2008) (Union Elevator II), we held that Union Elevator & Ware*202house Company, Inc., was entitled to relocation assistance benefits under Washington’s relocation assistance and real property acquisition policy act (Relocation Act), chapter 8.26 RCW. On remand, the trial court denied interest on the award of relocation benefits. We reverse the trial court’s decision, concluding that the State is liable for interest on damages under the Relocation Act. However, we affirm the trial court’s limitation of attorney…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Francis v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Shawn D Francis, V Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. WSDOTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009