Michele Lacroix v. Sears, Roebuck,and Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BATTEY, Senior District Judge.
Michele LaCroix (LaCroix) appeals from the order of the district court, 2 granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears), denying her retaliation and discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. We affirm.
FACTS
LaCroix worked for Sears from 1974 until 1998. At the time of her resignation, LaCroix was a human resource specialist for the Sears’ Eden Prairie facility in Minnesota. In the early 1990s, LaCroix became aware of allegations that her…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- C. Thomas RYTHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KARE 11, an NBC Affiliate; Gannett Co., Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Steven G. Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Noel P. Rahn, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Tamrat Tademe v. Saint Cloud State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Keri Henthorn v. Capitol Communications, Inc., Doing Business as Woi-Tv Channel 5 Jim ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Joyce Jacob-Mua Mee-Sook Kim Ned Klopfenstein v. Ann Veneman, Secretary of the United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.