Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 12, 2019No. 5:19-cv-03920Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING METLIFE 10 v. GROUP, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 32 12 Defendants. 13 14 Defendant MetLife Group, Inc. (“MetLife Group”) moves to dismiss all claims asserted 15 against it by plaintiff Marie A. Arnold. Dkt. No. 32. The Court held a hearing on the motion on 16 November 12, 2019. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.