Legal Opinion
Mincin v. Vail Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 9, 2002No. 01-1256PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Roy Mincin and Kemper Insurance Co. (“Kemper”) appeal the district court order granting partial summary judgment for the defendants and denying partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM.
I. Background
Roy Mincin decided to go mountain biking while on a business trip in Yail, Colorado. At the base of Vail Mountain, he purchased a gondola lift ticket and a bike rental coupon, which he was instructed to redeem at the bike rental area atop the mountain. At the rental area, Mincin was presented…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Springer v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, KSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United Fire & Casualty Company v. Boulder Plaza Residential, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Apartment Investment & Management Co. v. Nutmeg InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Squires v. Breckenridge Outdoor Education CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Espinoza v. Arkansas Valley Adventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.