Legal Opinion
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 14, 2010No. Civ. 07-272-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 18, 2007, Intermec Technologies Corporation (“Intermec” or “plaintiff’) filed this action against Palm, Inc. (“Palm” or “defendant”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,349,678 (“the '678 patent”), 5,568,645 (“the '645 patent”), and 5,987,499 (“the '499 patent,” collectively, “the System patents”), and 5,468,947 (“the '947 patent”), and 5,892,971 (“the '971 patent”, collectively “the Terminal patents,” all collectively, “the Intermec patents”). (D.I. 1)
Palm filed its answer on July 2, 2007, and thereafter amended it…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024