Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Lake

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 1995No. C7-95-579, C3-95-580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Douglas Anderson and Mary Slattery filed separate petitions for restraining orders against Barbara Lake. The petitions were consolidated and came on for hearing as required under Minn.Stat. § 609.748. The trial court issued a restraining order against Lake for a period of one year. At the hearing, the trial court did not require the parties to be sworn or permit the examination of witnesses. The restraining order is vacated and we remand to the district court for a hearing pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.748, requiring sworn testimony and examination of witnesses.

FACTS

Respond…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. El Nashaar v. El NashaarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kush v. MathisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Volkmann v. VolkmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API