Kush v. Mathison
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s issuance of a harassment restraining order, arguing that the evidence does not support the finding that his conduct constituted harassment. Because the record supports the district court’s findings, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Neil Mathison and respondent Glen Kush are next-door neighbors. Access to respondent’s property is made by use of a written easement that burdens appellant’s property. Despite numerous surveys, the parties are unable to agree on the precise location of the lot lines and easement, and an ongoing dispute between…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Anderson v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Bjergum v. BjergumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Davidson v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Welsh v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Darcie Gilliard and on behalf of minor children v. Jacob Alton LeathermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Grace Elizabeth Miller v. Brock FredinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Jamie Alysha Messerli v. Jonathan Warren CastilloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.