Legal Opinion

Metro Leasing and Development Corporation East Bay Chevrolet Company, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2004No. 02-73933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the 1995 federal tax return filed by the Metro Leasing and Development Corporation and the East Bay Chevrolet Company (collectively “Metro Leasing”), two small, closely-held California corporations. We must decide whether the United States Tax Court properly determined the amount of a corporate officer’s salary that Metro Leasing may deduct as a reasonable business expense under 26 U.S.C. § 162(a)(1). We affirm because the Tax Court did not clearly err when it adjusted the amount of this deduction. See Elliotts, Inc. v. Comm’r, 716 F.2d 1241, 1245…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of Gertrude Saunders v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Cumbie v. Woody Woo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Christensen v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. ABC Beverage Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API