Legal Opinion

Estate of Gertrude Saunders v. Cir

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 2014No. 12-70323PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal from the tax court, we consider whether the Estate of Gertrude Saunders (the Estate) properly claimed a $30 million deduction on its estate tax return for a lawsuit pending at the time of Gertrude Saunders’ death (the Stonehill Claim, or the Claim), even though the suit ultimately settled for a smaller sum. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) disallowed the $30 million deduction. Because the estimated value of the Stonehill Claim at the time of Gertrude Saunders’ death was not ascertainable with reasonable certainty, the tax…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Propstra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Graves v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul Torres, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Holley v. Gilead Scis., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. Domonic Malone v. Brian WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API