Legal Opinion

Arlington Realty Co. v. Gluck

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill is to quiet the title to land. The Rynda Development Company agreed in writing to sell the lot to the Chemtec Company, in which it was stipulated that the purchaser be let into possession. Permission was given to construct a dwelling. The Chemtec Company contracted debts in the construction of the building, and Salmon Company, materialmen, filed a lien claim, recovered judgment specially against the land, and, under execution, the property was sold and conveyed to the complainant. In the meanwhile the Chemtec Company transferred its contract to Amelia R. Gluck, and the Rynda…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barry v. TunickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  2. Gerard v. BirchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1877
  3. Raymond v. PostNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. HruzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Joffe v. GliksmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API