Legal Opinion
Maye v. Smith Barney Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 1995No. 95 Civ. 1878 (CBM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
By order and opinion dated August 17, 1995, this court referred the instant matter to arbitration because of the existence of binding agreements between the parties to arbitrate the instant dispute. See, Maye v. Smith Barney, Inc., 897 F.Supp. 100 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (hereinafter “August 17th Opinion”). Plaintiffs now move under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) for this court to certify the August 17th Opinion for appeal. For the reasons set forth herein, the plaintiffs’ request for leave to appeal is denied in all respects.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ermenegildo Zegna Corporation and Lanificio Ermenegildo Zegna, S.P.A. v. Lanificio Mario Zegna, S.P.A., Sespi Sette Spighe, S.P.A. And Romeo FashionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Topf v. Warnaco, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Pitter v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Triple Crown at Observatory Village Ass'n v. Village Homes of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Oldroyd v. Elmira Sav. Bank, FSBDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.