Legal Opinion

Ermenegildo Zegna Corporation and Lanificio Ermenegildo Zegna, S.P.A. v. Lanificio Mario Zegna, S.P.A., Sespi Sette Spighe, S.P.A. And Romeo Fashions

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1998No. 1981, Docket 96-9717PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge:

On and off since 1941, rival branches of the Zegna family have been disputing each other’s use of the ZEGNA name in connection with the manufacture or marketing of high-end woolen fabrics and clothing. Ten years ago, the rival companies — Ermenegildo Zeg-na Corporation (“EZC”) and Lanificio Mario Zegna, S.p.A. (“LMZ”) — settled litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by entering into an agreement, so ordered by the court, which (in relevant part) (i) specified in detail how and where LMZ may use the ZEGNA name, (ii)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Filanto, S.P.A. v. Chilewich International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Stedor Enterprises, Limited v. Armtex, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  2. Martens v. ThomannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Salim Oleochemicals v. M/v ShropshireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Cpr (Usa) Inc., Cpr v. Philip R. SprayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API