Floczak v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
The issue presented in this case is whether a claim for basic work loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Insurance Act 1 may be commenced by petition and rule. We hold that it may not be but that it must be commenced by praecipe for writ of summons or a complaint, as provided by Pa.R.C.P. 1007.
Appellee alleges that on December 18, 1976, she was hurt in an automobile accident, and as a result, incurred $2,326.75 in medical expenses and lost $8,082.90 in wages. She sought recovery under an insurance policy issued by appellant to the driver of the automobile in which she…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hartmann v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Pennsylvania Crime Commission PetitionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. DERRY TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. LivingoodCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by20 opinions
- Aivazoglou v. Drever FurnacesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Haegele v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jones v. State Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- JOHNSON BY JOHNSON v. TravelersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.