Aivazoglou v. Drever Furnaces
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether a petition for leave of court to amend a complaint to add defendants is effective to toll the statute of limitations where no action is commenced against such added defendants until after the time allowed by the statute of limitations has expired. The trial court held that the mere filing of a petition to amend a prior complaint did not toll the statute of limitations as to defendants not named in the original complaint and entered summary judgments in their favor. On appeal, we affirm. The procedural rules in this Commonwealth clearly and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Schmucker v. NaugleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Estate of Gasbarini v. Medical Center of Beaver County, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Donald Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept. Sean McCormack Asst. D.A. Denis Thomason, Donald UrrutiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Nelson v. County Of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Mariner Chestnut Partners, L.P. Ex Rel. Lamm v. LenfestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.