Legal Opinion
State v. Cecil
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 7, 1927No. 6 Div. 933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
Appellee was convicted in the court of misdemeanors for engaging in business as a commission merchant of farm produce without >a license, under article 23, § 9, of the Agricultural Code, Acts of 1923, p. 466.
On appeal to the circuit court, the cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts.
The court found that defendant was engaged in an interstate business only; that article 23 requires a license to do an interstate business, but is unconstitutional in so far as relates thereto. The defendant was discharged.
The state takes the appeal under Code, § 3239, to review the ruling of the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Shafer v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Di Santo v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson, Commissioner of Agriculture & IndustriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. PoweAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- State v. GautneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- State v. KimpelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.