Di Santo v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
273 U.S. 34 (1927)
DI SANTO
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 288.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 27, 1926.
Decided January 3, 1927.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Messrs. William H. Neely and John H. Neely, Jr., for the plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Philip S. Moyer and E. Le Roy Keen, with whom Mr. George W. Woodruff, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, was on the brief, for the defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · ButlerJustice Butler
Plaintiff in error was indicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, for a violation of an Act of the Legislature of July 17, 1919, as amended by the Act…
Also in this document: Dissent · Brandeis; Dissent · Stone.
3Cases cited58 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by80 opinions
- Leo C. Cockrell, and Carol P. Cockrell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Southern Pac. Co. v. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Sullivan, Attorney General of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Sparling v. HitsmanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.