Legal Opinion
Cox v. Aiken
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 21, 2004No. AC 25102PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff, Daniel K. Cox, commenced this action alleging that he had been laid off from his employment with the defendant department of social services (department) in violation of General Statutes § 5-241. The defendant Elizabeth Aiken, assistant director of human resources for the department, and the department, filed a motion to dismiss the action, claiming that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action. The court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion. The defendants then filed the present appeal, claiming that the court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Chotkowski v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. AikenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Morgan v. BubarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Wasilewski v. MacHugaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Cox v. AikenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.