Legal Opinion
Karmazin v. Pennsylvania RR
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 21, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
82 N.J. Super. 123 (1964)
196 A.2d 803
ESTHER KARMAZIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.[1]
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 6, 1964.
Decided January 21, 1964.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Philip L. Strong argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys; Mr. Peter B. Bass, of counsel).
Mr. Harold A. Sherman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Mandel, Wysoker, Sherman & Glassner, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.
Defendant appeals from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. ShapiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Jones v. LahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Hunter v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Griffin v. Hohorst, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Eden v. ConrailNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Mandal v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Harris v. Peridot Chem.(NJ), Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Muscato v. St. Mary's Catholic ChurchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Ertle v. StarkeyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.