Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 6, 2006No. 172,2005PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Chancery correctly decided that appellants’ Amended Complaint must be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The complaint purports to state several different claims arising out of appellants’ purchase of corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies that were supposed to generate significant tax benefits. In fact, the COLI policies did not generate tax benefits and appellants allegedly suffered more than $100 million in damages. We conclude that the complaint adequately alleges a claim of fraud. The complaint adequately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. In Re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc., LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. Norton v. PoplosSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. GheewallaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Reid v. SpazioSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. XL Specialty Insurance v. WMI Liquidating TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Auriga Capital Corp. v. Gatz Properties, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
  5. Soaring Wind Energy, L.L.C. v. Catic USA InCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API