Commonwealth v. Lopez
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Three Medford police officers apprehended the defendant Richard Lopez in possession of six packages of *742cocaine. In the trial leading to his conviction by a jury of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it (G. L. c. 94C, § 32A[c]), the Commonwealth introduced those bags of cocaine as essential evidence.1 On his appeal, Lopez claims error in the denial of his motion to suppress the drugs seized from him. He argues that the police failed to articulate a reasonable suspicion that he was committing or about to commit a crime, and that they had insufficient basis to open the fist in which…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GrandisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrissettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. AndujarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. KotlyarevskiyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007