Commonwealth v. Miranda
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.
The defendant appeals from his convictions of distribution of heroin, G. L. c. 94C, § 32, and of a second or subsequent offense of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, see G. L. c. 94C, § 32(b). On appeal he claims (1) erroneous amendment of an indictment; (2) erroneous admission of “modus operandi” police expert testimony; and (3) insufficiency of evidence as to joint venture. We reverse the conviction of distribution of heroin and vacate the conviction as to a second or subsequent offense.
1. Procedural setting. On June 28, 2000, a grand jury returned three indictments against the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. PeruzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004