Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Miranda

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 24, 2003No. 02-P-79PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.

The defendant appeals from his convictions of distribution of heroin, G. L. c. 94C, § 32, and of a second or subsequent offense of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, see G. L. c. 94C, § 32(b). On appeal he claims (1) erroneous amendment of an indictment; (2) erroneous admission of “modus operandi” police expert testimony; and (3) insufficiency of evidence as to joint venture. We reverse the conviction of distribution of heroin and vacate the conviction as to a second or subsequent offense.

1. Procedural setting. On June 28, 2000, a grand jury returned three indictments against the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. PeruzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. MerolaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API