Legal Opinion
Local 836 of the United Automobile Aerospace v. Echlin, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 22, 1987No. 84-CV-8357-FLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, District Judge.
Pending are four separate motions by defendant Echlin. The first two are summary judgment motions under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., seeking dismissal of Complaint Counts I and II. Also filed were motions to strike the jury demand and the prayer for mental distress damages.
Defendants are successors to Midland-Ross which had negotiated the 1981-1984 collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the plaintiff union. Defendants purchased the company from Midland Ross on August 31, 1982, in the middle of the contract period. When the contract expired,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schachner v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Schachner v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Stewart v. KHD Deutz of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Zielinski v. Pabst Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Ronald Stewart v. Khd Deutz Of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996