Legal Opinion

Traber v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1976No. 7528SC765Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

In actions tried upon the facts without a jury the trial judge is required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 52(a) (1) directs the court to “find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct entry of the appropriate judgment.”

The reason for requiring a separate statement of the conclusions of law is to allow the appellate courts to determine what law the trial court applied in directing the entry of judg*698ment. Hinson v. Jefferson, 287 N.C. 422, 215 S.E. 2d 102 (1975). The trial court’s conclusions of law are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Campbell v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Ayers v. TOMRICH CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API