Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. David James Yonkman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 20, 2013No. 2 CA-CR 2010-0338PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Judge.

¶ 1 This case comes to us on remand from State v. Yonkman, 231 Ariz. 496, ¶ 19, 297 P.3d 902, 905 (2013), vacating 229 Ariz. 291, 274 P.3d 1225 (App.2012). Appellant David Yonkman was convicted of sexual abuse and sexual conduct with a minor based on acts he had committed against his stepdaughter, C. The remaining issues to be decided on appeal are (1) whether his statements to police should have been suppressed because his Miranda 1 waiver had been involuntary and his wife had acted as an agent of the state; (2) whether the trial court erred by admitting prior acts…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Steve M. JarmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. BustosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. State v. CuevasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. State v. GehonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API