Legal Opinion

Jones v. Office of Open Records

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 2010No. 751 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Eric N. Jones, a state prison inmate, seeks review of a determination of the Office of Open Records (OOR) denying his written request under the recently re-enacted Right-to-Know Law (Law), 1 for written parole recommendations by the sentencing judge and prosecuting attorney to the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board). We affirm the OOR’s determination that the recommendations are exempt from disclosure because they are classified as “private and confidential” under Board regulation 37 Pa.Code § 61.2. 2

Some background to the underlying criminal case is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Johnson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Franklin v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Mostatab v. State Board of DentistryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Krantz v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. EisemanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Giurintano v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Mission PA, LLC v. W. McKelveyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform v. Pennsylvania Office of AdministrationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API