Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

These are two actions of tort, the first brought to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an accident which occurred shortly after nine o’clock in the evening of August 3, 1931, on Main Street, between Auburn and Oak streets, in that part of Boston called Charlestown. The second action was brought by the husband of the plaintiff in the first case to recover for loss of services and for money expended by him in an effort to cure his wife. Whenever the word plaintiff is used it will indicate the plaintiff in the first action. The bill of exceptions contains all the evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daignault v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Tobin v. Nahant & Lynn Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. DeLodge v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Hebert v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Woodward v. CityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API