Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 17, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff when he was struck by a streetcar operated by the individual defendant. The case is before us on the plaintiffs exceptions to: (1) the allowance of the defendants’ motion for directed verdicts; (2) certain evidentiary rulings; and (3) the denial of the plaintiffs motion for a new trial.

From the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, it could be found that on the evening of November 24, 1967, the plaintiff parked his car on Beacon Street east of the Kent Street intersection, along the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adams v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Daignault v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. O'Callaghan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Herwitz v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. LalumiereMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Doyle v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Rogers v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Walker v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API