Daignault v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These are three actions of tort to recover for personal injuries received on July 15, 1926, as the result of a collision of the plaintiffs with an electric car of the defendant on Massachusetts Avenue, in North Adams. Arthur Daignault will hereafter be referred to as the plaintiff.
On the day in question the plaintiff, accompanied by his two children, Alice, then about three and one half years of age, and Francis, then about four and one half years of age, had paid a visit to his mother who lived with his brother at number 1665 Massachusetts Avenue, which is located on the northerly side of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Casey v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Adams v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- O'Callaghan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Welsh v. Concord, Maynard & Hudson Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Tobin v. Nahant & Lynn Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Tucker v. RyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- DeLodge v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Hebert v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.