Legal Opinion
NYT CABLE TV v. Homestead at Mansfield, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 28, 1988Published
1Opinion of the Court
111 N.J. 21 (1988)
543 A.2d 10
NYT CABLE TV, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HOMESTEAD AT MANSFIELD, INC., HOMESTEAD AT MANSFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., MICHAEL LAINO AND DANIEL QUIGLEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF TKR CABLE COMPANY FOR ACCESS TO PREMISES KNOWN AS SOCIETY HILL AT PISCATAWAY PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 48:5A-49 AND N.J.A.C. 14:18-3.10(C)(1).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 9, 1987.
Decided June 28, 1988.
W. James MacNaughton argued the cause for appellant Society Hill at Piscataway…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of New York v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.