Clevenger v. Continental Oil Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
In this action we are called upon to determine the rights of the parties in and to oil and gas which may lie beneath real estate particularly described in the indenture which gives rise to the respective claims of the parties.
The question for determination is clearly presented by the instrument under which the parties claim and no good purpose would be served by a detailed statement of facts concerning which there is no dispute. We are concerned only with the legal effect of the following language contained in the instrument upon which each of the parties rely. That language is as follows:
“Thi…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Mitchell v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Corlett v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- Notch Mountain Corp. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Hudgeons v. Tenneco Oil Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Owens v. TergesonColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Osborne v. HolfordColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- KANARADO MINING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. SuttonColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.