Legal Opinion

Wurdeman v. Waller

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1928No. Docket No. 3375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendants Reba A. Wailer and W. J. Starr from a judgment entered against them in the sum of $1,528.89.

The facts are briefly these: Converse Wurdeman, the son of plaintiff, was engaged in the electrical business in Venice, California, under the fictitious name of “Coast Electric & Machinery Company.” On May 18, 1922, Converse Wurdeman executed and delivered to “The Electric Corporation,” a corporation of Los Angeles County, a promissory note in the sum of $2,000, payable in installments of $200 per month. The plaintiff Mrs. R. F. S. Wurdeman…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Richardson v. LampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Unger v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Board of Home Missions & Church Extension v. ManleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API