Wurdeman v. Waller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendants Reba A. Wailer and W. J. Starr from a judgment entered against them in the sum of $1,528.89.
The facts are briefly these: Converse Wurdeman, the son of plaintiff, was engaged in the electrical business in Venice, California, under the fictitious name of “Coast Electric & Machinery Company.” On May 18, 1922, Converse Wurdeman executed and delivered to “The Electric Corporation,” a corporation of Los Angeles County, a promissory note in the sum of $2,000, payable in installments of $200 per month. The plaintiff Mrs. R. F. S. Wurdeman…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Richardson v. LampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Unger v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Board of Home Missions & Church Extension v. ManleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.