Legal Opinion
State v. Accera
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 29, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 N.J. Super. 420 (1955)
116 A.2d 203
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FERDINAND ACCERA AND EMMA ACCERA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued July 11, 1955.
Decided July 29, 1955.
Before Judges CLAPP, PROCTOR and HANEMAN.
Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Roberts, Pillsbury & Carton, attorneys).
Mr. William R. Blair, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of RaritanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- James Smith Woolen Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
- Dorman v. Mayor C.C. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jacobs v. Mishawaka Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Borough of Saddle River v. BobinskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Grimley v. RidgewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- S & S v. Zoning Bd. for StratfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Camara v. Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.