Legal Opinion

Dorman v. Mayor C.C. of Balto.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1947No. [No. 68, October Term, 1946.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

This ah appeal from an order affirming the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals, which reversed a decision of the Buildings Engineer disallowing an application “to permit the continued use of the premises for a junk shop at 816-818-820 E. Lexington Street.” The question presented is whether this non-conforming use in a second commercial use district had been abandoned by the former owners of the property—or changed by them to a use of a higher classification, viz., a warehouse. If it had not, then it would seem that no “permit” or “certificate of occupancy” (Par. 36, Zoning Ordinance, No.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. ILLINOIS CENT. & C. RR v. Inter. Com. Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Searles v. DarlingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API