Legal Opinion

Fromer v. Shientag

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Isidor Wasservogel,

Spec. Ref. This is an action by co-owners of a cemetery plot to compel the removal of certain names placed by defendants on a monument in alleged violation of the directions of the testatrix.

The material facts have been conceded and read into the record. Plaintiffs possess an undivided 6/15th interest in a cemetery plot purchased by their father, one Benjamin Lobel, and his sister and brother, Kate Lobel Kronfeld and Simon Lobel. Benjamin Lobel died testate but made no specific reference to the cemetery plot in his will. His interest therein passed to plaintiffs in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Tonella v. Fishkill Rural CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In re the Estate of RosenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. Smith v. RectorNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tonella v. Fishkill Rural CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jewish Center of Mt. Vernon, Inc. v. Mt. Eden Cemetery Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API