Legal Opinion
Hawaii County Green Party v. Clinton
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 10, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-232 ACK, Civ.A. 00-166 ACKPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER AND TO CONSOLIDATE REOPENED CASE WITH PENDING CASE; ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
KAY, District Judge.
SYNOPSIS
The Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Civ. No. 00-166. This action was brought prematurely, as at this point in time the Navy’s EIS-OEIS application for its SURTASS LFA program has not been approved. While the Navy has expended substantial funds on research, including research vessels, over the past years, the Court concludes that this does not constitute an irretrievable and irreversible action such that the agency is…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Central Delta Water Agency v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Center for Biological Diversity v. HamiltonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.