Legal Opinion
State v. Schneckloth
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1990No. 89-1171PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Larry W. Schneckloth appeals from the district court’s denial of postconviction relief under Nebraska’s Postconviction Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3001 etseq. (Reissue 1989). Schneckloth, contending that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in his direct appeal, State v. Schneckloth, Koger, and Heathman, 210 Neb. 144, 313 N.W.2d 438 (1981), claims that the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing on Schneckloth’s motion for postconviction relief.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
A motion for postconviction relief cannot be used to secure review of issues which have already been…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WhitmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. VictorNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MarcheseNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SandersNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.