Legal Opinion

Locher v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAHERTY, Judge.

Edward Locher (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge denying Claimant’s Claim Petition. We affirm.

Claimant filed a Claim Petition alleging that, as of April 16, 1996, he is totally disabled as a result of inhaling coal dust, salt dust and other airborne matter while working as a street sweeper for the City of Johnstown (Employer) and that this exposure to dust caused him to experience breathing problems and “other medical conditions.” Employer filed an Answer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Sharkey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Toal Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. J.R. Sherman v. County of Mercer (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API