Legal Opinion
United States v. Marco Luis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2014No. 13-50020PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (“MVRA”) requires a district court to order restitution when (1) a defendant commits an “offense against property,” and (2) there is a “victim.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(l), (c)(1). We affirm the district court’s determination that both requirements were met in this case.
Marco Luis pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to engage in monetary transactions in property in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(h) and 1957 for his part in the purchase of two parcels of real property with fraudulently obtained loans. Because Luis’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Joan C. Howard v. Everex Systems, Inc., Steven L.W. Hui Michael C.Y. Wong Wong's International (Holdings) Limited Gatcombe Corp. N.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. WaknineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Robers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Timothy RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Mark SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.