Legal Opinion
Raschel v. Rish
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendant’s motion dismissing complaint and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term that personal jurisdiction over separate defendants may not be obtained by service of a single summons on a person who qualifies as a representative of a corporation pursuant to CPLR 311 (1) and as a person of suitable age and discretion at a natural person’s actual place of business under CPLR 308 (2). Such service cannot be deemed to be " 'reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise [the] interested…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Bossuk v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Raschel v. RishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- D'Andria v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feszczyszyn v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Derso v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Townley v. Emerson Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1998
- City of New York v. Wall Street Racquet Club, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- World's Busiest Corner Corp. v. Cine 42nd Street Theater Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1986