Legal Opinion

Steckley v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1979No. 2140 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

On September 8, 1978, Mildred Steckley filed a complaint in trespass against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (Penn-DOT) within the original jurisdiction of this Court. Thereafter, PennDOT filed preliminary objections to this complaint. Steckley then filed preliminary objections to PennDOT’s preliminary objections. Having *369had the benefit of oral argument, we now address those issues raised by these objections.

The complaint alleges that following PennDOT’s construction of an extension of Route 81 in East Pennsboro Township, surface waters…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Lerro v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Vance v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lutzko v. Mikris, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Poole v. Township of DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Enon Valley Telephone Co. v. MarketCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for SR 1032, Section B02, in the Borough of Rochester: Cronimet Corp. v. PennDOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API