City of Iola v. Hobart
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The city of Iola invokes our original jurisdiction in mandamus to require H. Hobart, mayor of the city, to sign a contract for the construction of a swimming pool.
Involved in the action are questions of law touching the validity of certain procedural steps taken by the city to acquire lands for the purpose of enlarging and improving its public park system, the significance to be attached to an authorized bond issue of $30,000, and negotiations with the federal government for a grant of funds toward the cost of the project.
*710The pertinent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Weber v. YounkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- State ex rel. Hopkins v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Kolster v. American Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Hunt v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- State ex rel. McCormick v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Robertson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- State ex rel. Boynton v. BuchananSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- City of Coffeyville v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.