Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1916No. 20,795PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J:

The action is one of quo warranto to try the title to the office of mayor of the city of Arkansas City.

The plaintiff and the defendant were opposing candidates at the election held in April, 1916. The defendant received the certificate of election. The petition charged that a sufficient number of votes to change the result should not be counted for the defendant, for reasons which were stated. The court appointed Hon. T. A. Noftzger, of Wichita, as commissioner to take the testimony and report findings of fact and conclusions of law. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Newell v. PurdyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Bill v. EltingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Sage Stores Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Hopkins v. FoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Graham ex rel. Graham v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. City of Iola v. HobartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Parker v. McKnaughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API