Legal Opinion
In Re Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 9, 2001No. 19-20145PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CPV. P. 52(c) 1
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
The motion before the court arises out of a proceeding brought by a Chapter 11 debtor-in-possession to estimate, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 502(c) 2 , a creditor’s unliquidated claim for the imposition of a constructive trust “at zero” for purposes of allowance (“the estimation motion”). After the debtor presented its witnesses, requiring, with extensive cross-examination, four days of trial, the debtor and the creditors’ committee (together, “the movants”) jointly filed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Omegas Group, Inc., Debtor. Xl/datacomp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John R. Wilson, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- John W. Bittner v. Borne Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Majutama v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. (In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- In Re Bicoastal Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
- United States v. Sterling Consulting Corp. (In Re Indian Motocycle Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re A.P.I. Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- In re VodenosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Chain Technology, Inc. v. Fleet National Bank (In Re Handy & Harman Refining Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2003